Facing a
lifetime ban from baseball, which would include the forfeiture of $86 million
in salary plus being officially barred from the Hall of Fame, Alex Rodriguez
has undoubtedly been spending a lot of time with his lawyers.
In a case
like this, Rodriguez and his lawyers would sit down and weigh his options. They
would play out different scenarios identifying the pros and cons. Here are his
key options:
Option 1: Dig In and Fight
Baseball
has reportedly offered Rodriguez a deal: agree to be suspended and forfeit your
right to an appeal, and in exchange we will only suspend you for the rest of
this season and all of next season. If he agrees to that, if/when he returned
in 2015 at the age of 38, he would have 3 years left at $61 million. Not too
shabby.
However,
if Rodriguez decides not to cut a deal, reports are that Commissioner Bud Selig
will suspend him for life. On top of that, baseball will suspend Rodriguez, in
part, under the Collective Bargaining Agreement (and not just the Drug Policy).
This
distinction matters. If Rodriguez were only suspended under the Drug Policy, he
would be able to play during his appeal (which will be heard by Fredric
Horowitz). That would mean we could see him back this season playing for the
Yankees. However, if MLB suspended Rodriguez under the CBA, he would not be
allowed to play while his case is being appealed. Under the CBA, baseball can
go this route if a player has engaged in conduct that is detrimental or
prejudicial to the “best interests of baseball”, and can include things like breaking
federal, state or local laws. This isn’t something baseball exercises lightly;
it’s a dramatic option.
There is
even the option of baseball invoking Article XI(A)(1)(b) of the Basic Agreement,
which provides that Selig can make a ruling if a case involves “the
preservation of the integrity of, or the maintenance of public confidence in,
the game of baseball”. This is also important. If Selig exercises this option,
Rodriguez’s appeal would not go to an independent arbitrator but rather back to
Selig. That would all but guaranteed a loss for Rodriguez. However, Selig has
advised that he won’t be doing this.
So if
Rodriguez decided not to cut a deal, his next step would be to appeal his lifetime
ban. That appeal would first go to Mr. Horowitz. We haven’t seen the evidence
against Rodriguez. Reports however, are that it is overwhelming and
substantial. It may also include things like witness tampering, interfering
with the investigation and recruiting athletes to Biogenesis (allegations which
Rodriguez has denied). Even with this evidence, baseball may have a difficult
time getting Mr. Horowitz to uphold the lifetime ban on appeal.
The
lifetime ban punishment is only for the most exceptional of circumstances, and
while PED use and possible obstruction of justice charges are very serious, generally more is needed
before a player can be denied lifetime employment in baseball. This is
particularly the cse for someone who has not been suspended before. Historically
in baseball, it’s tough to enforce these types of bans. This isn’t breaking
news, and baseball is aware of this.
So
Rodriguez if appeals the ban, it may be reduced to somewhere around 150 games –
which would be most of next season. But really, that’s just a guess. A lot will
turn on the evidence. If it shows an extensive pattern of PED use together with
substantial interference with the investigation, it could be more.
If he’s unhappy
with whatever ruling the arbitrator’s makes, Rodriguez could head to court. If he
did, Rodriguez would attack the credibility of those who provided the evidence,
including Biogenesis founder Tony Bosch and former employee Porter Fisher.
Bosch has allegedly engaged in criminal activity and would become a significant
target of a Rodriguez defence. His legal team would also hope that the pressure
of litigation may encourage MLB to settle on more favourable terms. However,
that seems unlikely given that baseball is accustomed to litigation and is fully
committed to this case.
So if he
elects to fight, he first heads to arbitration (while still suspended) and then
possibly off to court. Messy and long.
Option 2: Cut A Deal
The
evidence against Ryan Braun was overwhelming and substantial. For that reason,
he accepted a major suspension even in the absence of a positive drug test (he
has the same lawyer as Rodriguez by the way). According to reports, the
evidence against Rodriguez is even more overwhelming and even more substantial.
There are also reports of a longstanding relationship between Rodriguez and
Bosch going back a number of years.
If there
is indeed very good evidence against Rodriguez, his lawyers will canvass the
benefits of settlement. First, if he agrees to the deal on the table, he could
be back in 2015 and still have 3 years/$61 million left on his deal.
As well,
by agreeing to MLB’s terms, he will get immediate certainty as far as the
length of his suspension. In contrast,
if he goes to arbitration, the length may be reduced but may still exceed MLB’s
current offer. And if this somehow ends up in Court, this could take multiple
years to litigate – and the entire time Rodriguez may not be able to return to
baseball. So if he fights, the only certainty is uncertainty.
There is also
the matter of legal fees. At $450 million, Rodriguez is the highest paid
athlete in major league baseball history. So lawyer fees aren't going to be an
issue.
On the
flip side, if he takes the deal he will effectively be declaring his guilt. You
might remember that he admitted to using PEDs for three-year period beginning
in 2001. By agreeing to a suspension now, the public may well conclude that he
has used his entire career. Essentially, there would be no recovering his
legacy. He will be perceived as the Lance Armstrong of baseball. The problem
for Rodriguez is that the legacy ship may have already sailed.
Option 3: Try Something Else.
Cricket
looks like fun.
Ultimately,
Rodriguez seems cornered. He is looking to pick the best option available to
him under the circumstances. Not an enviable position to be in.
Indeed, rock
meet hard place.
No comments:
Post a Comment